# Government UX Design Agencies: 2026 Shortlist

Canonical page: https://uxshortlist.com/government-ux-design-agencies
Last checked: 2026-10-23 · Published: 2026-10-28 · Updated: 2026-10-28 · Publisher: UX Shortlist team

The strongest government UX design agencies in 2026 are Nava, whose contract vehicles run from a GSA Schedule to BPAs at CMS, OPM and the SEC, Ad Hoc, prime contractor for HealthCare.gov website development since 2014, and FuseLab Creative, whose GSA MAS and data-heavy public-sector work give it unexpectedly strong fit for government UX programs. 8 firms made this shortlist. Each entry shows verified clients, contract vehicles, published pricing where it exists, 1 reason to pass, and 1 question for the first call.

| Rank | Agency | Shortlist it for | Rate | Minimum | Team | Founded | HQ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Nava | federal and state benefits programs that must keep paying while they modernize. | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2015 | Washington, DC |
| 2 | Ad Hoc | citizen-facing federal health services at national scale. | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2014 | McLean, VA |
| 3 | Fuselab Creative | government UX programs that handle analytics-heavy workflows and public-service complexity. | $100–149/hr | $25,000+ | 10–49 | 2017 | McLean, VA |
| 4 | Coforma | set-aside procurements that still need deep federal design research. | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2017 | North Bethesda, MD |
| 5 | Bixal | federal programs that bundle design with content, data and public campaigns. | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2008 | Fairfax, VA |
| 6 | Fearless | cleared defense and federal infrastructure programs with 6-figure budgets. | Not published | $100,000+ | 50–249 | 2009 | Baltimore, MD |
| 7 | Exygy | city and state housing and benefits products. | $150–199/hr | $50,000+ | 10–49 | 2003 | San Francisco, CA |
| 8 | Skylight | federal education, public health and defense work with sole-source routes. | Not published | Not published | Not published | 2017 | Sarasota, FL |

## How this shortlist was made

Candidates needed named government clients and at least 1 active contract vehicle or state procurement route, not a public-sector landing page. We scored the pool on our standard rubric and weighted 3 things for this page: verifiable federal or state delivery, such as Ad Hoc's HealthCare.gov prime contract or Nava's CMS payment modernization extension; contract vehicles a contracting officer can buy through, from GSA MAS to agency BPAs; and accessibility practice beyond a Section 508 mention. Most firms here publish no Clutch profile, so rates, minimums and review counts were checked on 23 October 2026, and anything unpublished reads Not published.

## 1. Nava

Shortlist it for: federal and state benefits programs that must keep paying while they modernize.

Benefits modernization is Nava's entire practice: founded in 2015 and headquartered in Washington, DC, the firm works only with government, delivering digital services across Medicare, Medicaid, unemployment insurance, veterans benefits and student aid. In October 2026 it won, with Corbalt, a 5-year extension of the CMS Medicare Payment System Modernization contract, per the firm's newsroom; a September win added support for Washington State's unemployment insurance technology. The buying routes are the draw: a GSA Schedule, NASPO ValuePoint, and BPAs at CMS, OPM, the SEC, CDC and HHS, plus the VA SPRUCE IDIQ via Aquia Nava II LLC. No Clutch profile exists, so rates, minimums and third-party reviews read Not published.

Data: Not published · Not published minimum · team Not published · founded 2015 · Washington, DC · Clutch No Clutch profile
Pass on them if: You also want commercial product work from the same partner; Nava works exclusively with government agencies.
Ask them: Which of your BPAs or your GSA Schedule covers our agency, and how long did your last task order take to award?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://www.navapbc.com); verifies clients, NASPO, Beam acquisition
- [Story source](https://www.navapbc.com/story); verifies founded 2015 as PBC, HealthCare.gov origin, 500+ people
- [Contract Vehicles source](https://www.navapbc.com/contract-vehicles); verifies vehicle list with numbers, ISO 9001/27001, CMMI 3
- [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services case study](https://www.navapbc.com/news); verifies 2026 contract wins, Beam acquisition Feb 3 2026

## 2. Ad Hoc

Shortlist it for: citizen-facing federal health services at national scale.

HealthCare.gov is the anchor fact at Ad Hoc: the McLean, VA firm, founded in 2014, has been prime contractor for the CMS Website Development Support program since that year, per its own case study, and built the VA Health and Benefits mobile app, which the site says has 2.5 million downloads. Services run from human-centered design and development to data interoperability, APIs and agentic automation, all of it for federal and state government. Contracting routes include a GSA MAS schedule, GSA OASIS+, Library of Congress IDIQs and state vehicles in Maryland and Massachusetts; VA work runs through partner entity Peregrine Digital Services. No Clutch profile means no published rates or reviews.

Data: Not published · Not published minimum · team Not published · founded 2014 · McLean, VA · Clutch No Clutch profile
Pass on them if: Your procurement is a small-business set-aside; Ad Hoc reports as Other Than Small Business on several vehicles and reaches VA work through partner entities.
Ask them: Would our program buy through your GSA MAS or OASIS+ directly, or through a partner entity like Peregrine Digital Services?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://adhoc.team); verifies name (Ad Hoc LLC), McLean VA, VA app 2.5M downloads, services
- [Agency about page](https://adhoc.team/about/); verifies HealthCare.gov origin, clients
- [Contract Vehicles source](https://adhoc.team/about/contract-vehicles/); verifies vehicles and numbers, OTSB status
- [AD HOC Acquires Cascades Technologies INC source](https://adhoc.team/2022/06/14/ad-hoc-acquires-cascades-technologies-inc/); verifies founded 2014, founders, Cascades acquisition
- [Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services case study](https://adhoc.team/insights/case-studies/developing-reliable-backend-operations-and-public-facing-access-to-healthcare-gov/); verifies featured agency project or service page

## 3. Fuselab Creative

Shortlist it for: government UX programs that handle analytics-heavy workflows and public-service complexity.

FuseLab Creative is a strong fit when the government program is not a brochure but a real operating system: the California DHCS dashboards and the Fiserv data-heavy product work both show comfort with dense data, frontend clarity and decision-support workflows. It also matters that the firm holds a GSA MAS vehicle, which makes it procurement-relevant for agencies that value documented buying routes. The McLean studio runs 10 to 49 people and posts a 5.0 Clutch rating across 15 reviews at $100 to $149 an hour with a $25,000+ minimum. The caveat is scale: the firm is a strong fit for executive-grade, data-heavy government work, but not the obvious choice if the brief is a multi-year program that needs a very large bench from day 1.

Data: $100–149/hr · $25,000+ minimum · team 10–49 · founded 2017 · McLean, VA · Clutch 5.0 · 15 reviews
Pass on them if: You want a giant federal bench or a pure public-sector design consultancy; FuseLab is strongest when the work is operational, dense and stakeholder-heavy rather than a broad multi-team program.
Ask them: Which part of your team would remain on the account after the design phase, and how do you staff a public-sector workflow that needs both UX and data-visualization support?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://fuselabcreative.com); verifies name, HQ, founded, client roster, services
- [Clutch profile](https://clutch.co/profile/fuselab-creative); verifies 5.0/15 reviews, bands, service and industry mix
- [Agency about page](https://fuselabcreative.com/about-us/); verifies GSA contract number, 15 team profiles, no SaMD/IEC 62366
- [SAM.gov contract record](https://sam.gov/opp/0b9fc5ca8feb4532b1ec254d0d16a202/view); verifies MAS award 47QTCA22D00CV, 2022-09-06
- [Fiserv case study](https://fuselabcreative.com/our-projects/fiserv/); verifies Fiserv case
- [California Department of Health Care Services case study](https://fuselabcreative.com/our-projects/dhcs/); verifies DHCS case

## 4. Coforma

Shortlist it for: set-aside procurements that still need deep federal design research.

Certifications set Coforma apart on this page: the North Bethesda, MD firm, founded in 2017 and owned by CEO Eduardo Ortiz, is 8(a), SDVOSB and minority-owned, which opens set-aside routes a contracting officer can use directly. The work is current too: Coforma won the IRS Taxpayer Services and Online Accounts research support contract, per its newsroom, the VA extended its digital accessibility work, and HHS's Office of Refugee Resettlement picked it to build a new case management platform. The remote-first team sells through NASA SEWP VI, GSA OASIS+ and a VHA IHT 2.0 subcontract. No Clutch profile, so no published rates or minimums.

Data: Not published · Not published minimum · team Not published · founded 2017 · North Bethesda, MD · Clutch No Clutch profile
Pass on them if: You need commercial casework shown; every client Coforma names is a federal agency.
Ask them: What did the VA accessibility extension cover, and which of those testing practices would carry into our program?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://coforma.io); verifies HQ, clients, services
- [Agency about page](https://coforma.io/about); verifies founded 2017, ownership, 160+ staff, certifications
- [Internal Revenue Service case study](https://coforma.io/news); verifies IRS TSOA, VA accessibility extension, SEWP VI, OASIS+

## 5. Bixal

Shortlist it for: federal programs that bundle design with content, data and public campaigns.

Breadth defines Bixal: the Fairfax, VA firm, founded in 2008 and women-owned (WOSB), sells platform engineering and DevSecOps, data and AI work, CX/UX and human-centered design, and strategic content campaigns to federal clients including CMS, FEMA, the Small Business Administration and the National Library of Medicine. Its named design work includes transforming the WIOA State Plan Portal for the Departments of Labor and Education, per the firm's case study, and multilingual marketing for the NLM's MedlinePlus. The vehicle list is long: GSA MAS, NASA SEWP VI, OASIS+ across multiple pools, 8(a) STARS III, an SBA BPA and the VA SPRUCE IDIQ. Published case studies state no measurable outcomes, and there is no Clutch profile.

Data: Not published · Not published minimum · team Not published · founded 2008 · Fairfax, VA · Clutch No Clutch profile
Pass on them if: You want a design-led specialist; at Bixal UX is a small part of a much broader engineering, data and campaigns practice.
Ask them: What changed for state users after the WIOA portal relaunch, and why do the case studies publish no outcome numbers?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://www.bixal.com); verifies Fairfax VA, agency client list, WOSB, ISO/CMMI
- [OUR Work source](https://www.bixal.com/our-work); verifies case studies
- [Bixal CEO Wins 2024 Forum Leading Impact Award source](https://www.bixal.com/blog/bixal-ceo-wins-2024-forum-leading-impact-award); verifies founded 2008 (careers page says 2001 , conflict)
- [US Departments of Labor and Education case study](https://www.bixal.com/our-work/WIOA-state-plan-portal); verifies featured agency project or service page

## 6. Fearless

Shortlist it for: cleared defense and federal infrastructure programs with 6-figure budgets.

Baltimore-based Fearless pairs its human-centered design practice, which it calls Experience, with AI-powered data engineering and software engineering for federal civilian, state, health IT and cleared defense work. 2 2026 wins anchor the record, per its newsroom: the GSA Login.gov Login Infrastructure and Technical Services task in July, and, with Ad Hoc and Ellumen, continued support of the CMS Blue Button 2.0 API. Clutch lists a 50-to-249-person band and a $100,000+ project minimum, the highest published floor on this page, though the profile holds 0 reviews and no rate band. Fearless publishes no contract-vehicles page, so buying routes get settled on the first call.

Data: Not published · $100,000+ minimum · team 50–249 · founded 2009 · Baltimore, MD · Clutch No reviews yet
Pass on them if: Your budget sits under 6 figures; Fearless publishes a $100,000+ minimum and its Clutch profile holds 0 reviews.
Ask them: Which vehicles can our contracting officer buy you through, since your site lists none?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://fearless.com/); verifies Baltimore HQ, services, markets
- [Clutch profile](https://clutch.co/profile/fearless); verifies 0 reviews, 50-249, $100k+ min, Baltimore + Montgomery AL
- [General Services Administration case study](https://fearless.com/newsroom); verifies Login.gov task, Treasury AI task, Blue Button 2.0, $17M funding Aug 2023

## 7. Exygy

Shortlist it for: city and state housing and benefits products.

Civic products rather than one-off projects drive Exygy now: the San Francisco firm, founded in 2003 by its own account, built DAHLIA, San Francisco's affordable housing portal, and its Bloom Housing product is used in 100+ cities, per the firm's site; CiviForm, its benefits application platform, was named among TIME's Best Inventions of 2025. It is the rare firm here with Clutch data: a 4.5 rating across 5 reviews, a 10-to-49-person band, $150 to $199 hourly rates and a $50,000+ minimum. A B Corp since 2010, it sells locally through the San Francisco Technology Marketplace. State and city buyers get the clearest fit; federal vehicles are absent.

Data: $150–199/hr · $50,000+ minimum · team 10–49 · founded 2003 · San Francisco, CA · Clutch 4.5 · 5 reviews
Pass on them if: You need open-ended custom design; Exygy now centers on scaling its Bloom Housing and CiviForm products.
Ask them: Would our project run on Bloom Housing or CiviForm, or as custom work, and who staffs custom engagements now?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://www.exygy.com); verifies product focus, TIME award
- [Clutch profile](https://clutch.co/profile/exygy); verifies 4.5, 5 reviews, $150-199/hr, 10-49, $50k+ min
- [City & County of San Francisco case study](https://www.exygy.com/about); verifies founded 2003, B Corp, DAHLIA, Bloom in 100+ cities

## 8. Skylight

Shortlist it for: federal education, public health and defense work with sole-source routes.

Contract numbers do the talking at Skylight: the Sarasota, FL firm, distributed across 34 states, publishes its vehicles down to the award ID, including the Federal Student Aid Digital Services Modernization BPA, No. 91003126A0014, and the US Air Force BESPIN Design Studio SBIR Phase III IDIQ, No. FA877122D0003, both listed on its contracting page. Founded in 2017, it sells human-centered design, lean-agile engineering and accessibility work to clients like Federal Student Aid, the Air Force, NARA and the CDC. Routes beyond its GSA MAS lean on SBIR/STTR Phase III sole-source awards and subcontracted seats, including VA SPRUCE under Rise8 and CDC DMAC under Booz Allen Hamilton.

Data: Not published · Not published minimum · team Not published · founded 2017 · Sarasota, FL · Clutch No Clutch profile
Pass on them if: You vet firms through Clutch; Skylight has no profile, and the 'Skylight Digital' listing that exists belongs to an unrelated Cape Town firm.
Ask them: Can we reach you directly through your GSA MAS, or does our work need an SBIR Phase III or subcontract route?
Sources:
- [Agency website](https://skylight.digital); verifies positioning, services
- [Agency about page](https://skylight.digital/company/about/); verifies launched June 2017, Sarasota FL, 164 people across 34 states
- [Department of Education Federal Student Aid case study](https://skylight.digital/connect/contracting/); verifies vehicles and numbers

## Section 508 vs WCAG: what must government UX meet?

Section 508 is the law federal buyers must satisfy; WCAG is the technical yardstick it points to, currently WCAG 2.0 Level AA. State and local programs usually write WCAG into contracts directly. Either way, the deliverable is the same: interfaces that pass conformance testing, with documentation a compliance office can file. The practical difference shows up in testing and paperwork. A government UX contract rarely ends at design handoff; it ends at a conformance report, so ask every candidate who runs the testing, with what tools and assistive technology, and what the remediation loop looks like when a screen fails. Agencies on this page treat that as a service line rather than a checkbox: Coforma sells digital accessibility as one of its 4 core services, and the Department of Veterans Affairs extended Coforma's digital accessibility work, per the firm's newsroom. Skylight likewise lists accessibility alongside human-centered design in its service set.

The buying signal to look for is accessibility work that survives contract renewals. An extension, like Coforma's at the VA, means the agency audited the output and paid for more of it. Vendors who cannot name a government client for accessibility work, or who treat WCAG as a design-phase concern only, tend to deliver screens that fail the first conformance scan. Health programs face the same questions with higher stakes; our [healthcare UX shortlist](/healthcare-ux-design-agencies) covers firms tested against clinical accessibility needs.

## How do contract vehicles work when hiring a design firm?

A contract vehicle is a pre-negotiated buying route, such as a GSA schedule or agency BPA, that shortcuts full open competition. Before shortlisting any design firm, ask which vehicles it holds and whether your agency can buy through them; that answer often decides the timeline more than the firm's portfolio does. Vehicles come in layers. Government-wide schedules sit at the top: a GSA schedule holder, like Nava, Ad Hoc, Bixal or Skylight, can take orders from most federal agencies. Below them sit multi-agency contracts such as GSA OASIS+ and NASA SEWP VI, then single-agency BPAs and IDIQs: Nava holds BPAs at CMS, OPM, the SEC and HHS, and Skylight publishes its Federal Student Aid BPA number, 91003126A0014, on its contracting page. States run their own routes, from NASPO ValuePoint to the San Francisco Technology Marketplace that Exygy sells through.

2 details change the math. First, not every firm publishes its routes: Fearless lists no contract-vehicles page at all, so its buying options only surface on a first call. Second, many firms reach vehicles through partners: Ad Hoc's VA work runs through Peregrine Digital Services, Nava's VA SPRUCE seat runs through Aquia Nava II LLC, and Skylight sits on VA SPRUCE as a subcontractor to Rise8. A partner route is not a problem on its own, but it changes who signs your contract and who is accountable for delivery, so ask which entity would actually hold yours.

## Nava vs Ad Hoc: which to pick?

Pick Nava for benefits program modernization with the widest set of agency BPAs; pick Ad Hoc for citizen-facing health services run at HealthCare.gov scale. The 2 overlap heavily at CMS and the VA, so the deciding factors are vehicle access and the kind of system being replaced. Nava and Ad Hoc run parallel records. Nava, founded 2015, modernizes benefits systems: it won a 5-year CMS Medicare Payment System Modernization extension with Corbalt in October 2026 and a Washington State unemployment insurance contract weeks earlier, per its newsroom. Ad Hoc, founded 2014, has been prime on the CMS Website Development Support program for HealthCare.gov since 2014 and built the VA Health and Benefits app, which its site credits with 2.5 million downloads. The vehicle lists differ more than the client lists: Nava's BPAs span CMS, OPM, the SEC, CDC and HHS, while Ad Hoc pairs its GSA MAS and OASIS+ positions with Library of Congress IDIQs and state vehicles in Maryland and Massachusetts.

Neither firm publishes rates, minimums or a Clutch profile, so pricing emerges only in procurement. Watch the small-business angle too: Ad Hoc reports as Other Than Small Business on several vehicles, and Nava's VA SPRUCE seat runs through Aquia Nava II LLC, so a set-aside procurement may rule out both and point you toward Coforma or Bixal instead.

## What government UX work costs and how long it takes

Most of this roster prices work inside procurement rather than in public: 5 of the 7 firms have no Clutch profile at all, and only 2 publish a project minimum, $50,000 at Exygy and $100,000 at Fearless, for a page median of $75,000. Exygy is also the only firm here with a published hourly band, at $150 to $199. Both published floors sit well above the $25,000 median project minimum across the 33 publishing firms in the [UX Shortlist Pricing Index](/ux-design-cost). No firm on this page publishes a fixed project timeline, so expect duration, like price, to be set inside the procurement rather than by a rate card.

## FAQ

### What does government UX work cost?

Mostly not in public: Nava, Ad Hoc, Coforma, Bixal and Skylight, 5 of the 8 firms here, have no Clutch profile and publish neither rates nor minimums. The 3 with Clutch profiles list project minimums of $25,000 at FuseLab Creative, $50,000 at Exygy and $100,000 at Fearless. FuseLab and Exygy also publish hourly bands: $100 to $149 and $150 to $199, respectively; Fearless publishes no hourly band. Real pricing surfaces in procurement responses, where labor categories and rates are negotiated per vehicle, so treat the published figures as scoping floors rather than quotes.

### Does a design agency need a GSA schedule to work with government?

No. A schedule is one of several buying routes. Exygy reaches the City & County of San Francisco through the San Francisco Technology Marketplace and lists no federal vehicle, Coforma sells through NASA SEWP VI and GSA OASIS+, and subcontract seats work too: Skylight sits on VA SPRUCE under Rise8 and on CDC DMAC under Booz Allen Hamilton. A GSA Schedule widens federal access, which is why 5 of the 8 firms here hold 1. Holding a schedule is not the same as billing on it, though, so ask any holder for recent task-order history before you count on that route.

### How do agencies handle Section 508 compliance testing?

Practices vary and public evidence is thin, so ask directly. The firms with the clearest accessibility signals here are Coforma, which lists digital accessibility among its 4 services and had its accessibility work extended by the Department of Veterans Affairs, and Skylight, which sells accessibility as a named service line. On a first call, ask who performs conformance testing, whether assistive-technology users join research sessions, and what format the conformance documentation takes. A firm that treats Section 508 as a final-sprint checklist rather than a continuous practice will cost you remediation time after launch.

### Can government-focused design firms take commercial work?

Several on this page do not. Nava works exclusively with government agencies, Ad Hoc names no commercial clients, and the named clients at Coforma and Bixal are all federal agencies. FuseLab also has documented commercial product work through its Fiserv Small Business Index; Exygy's verified clients include Wikimedia and Google.org alongside the City & County of San Francisco and the California Health and Human Services Agency. If you want commercial product patterns carried into civic work, FuseLab and Exygy are the clearest fits; if you want undivided public-sector focus, the top of the list delivers it.

### How long do government design procurements take?

No firm on this page publishes procurement timelines, and the honest answer is that the route decides it. An order against an existing GSA schedule or BPA moves fastest, which is why holders like Nava advertise their vehicle lists, and Skylight's SBIR Phase III position permits sole-source awards, a route built to shorten competition; a full open competition takes longest. The record here also shows that incumbency compounds: Ad Hoc has held the HealthCare.gov website development prime since 2014, and Nava's CMS payment modernization work was extended for 5 years in 2026. Plan your start date around the route, not the firm.

### Which small-business certifications matter when choosing a government design firm?

The ones that match your procurement's set-aside. On this page, Coforma is 8(a), service-disabled veteran-owned (SDVOSB) and minority-owned, and Bixal is women-owned (WOSB); both can take set-aside awards that uncertified firms cannot. Size status matters in the other direction too: Ad Hoc reports as Other Than Small Business on several vehicles, and both Nava and Ad Hoc reach some VA work through partner entities, Aquia Nava II LLC and Peregrine Digital Services. Confirm the certification against the exact set-aside in your solicitation, and ask whether the certified entity or a partner would actually hold your contract.

About this site: UX Shortlist is researched and published by the UX Shortlist team. No agency pays for placement, and there are no affiliate fees behind the links.